However, GAAR held that parathas are not ready for
consumption but require three-four minutes of cooking
and that they are not akin to roti or chapati which are
primarily wheat flour products. As such, the authority
had ruled that parathas will come under another
classification which attracts 18 per cent rate.
Vadilal then approached GAAAR. It argued that GAAR erred
when it observed that plain chapatti or roti does not
require processing before consumption. It argued that
paratha, chapati or roti have to be heated for making
them eatable.
It also said pizza bread draws five per cent GST while
it is clear that it requires heating and cooking before
consumption.
However, the appellate authority said different
varieties of parathas supplied by the company include
ingredients such as margarine, salt, emulsifying agent,
milk, edible oil, sugar, bread improver, potato, green
peas, cauliflower, carrot, coriander powder, spices,
cardamom, clove, pomegranate seeds etc., depending upon
the type of parathas apart from wheat flour and water.
Even plain paratha, apart from whole wheat flour and water, contains margarine,
salt, emulsifying agent, edible vegetable oil and bread improver. Roti or
chapati is consumed directly, but the parathas manufactured and supplied by the
appellant require to be cooked before the same can be consumed, GAAAR said.
As such, it held that parathas are not the same as chapatis and need to be
classified under the different heading which attract 18 per cent tax rate.
This is not the first dispute that went to an AAR. Since the GST system
classifies food items based on the harmonised system of nomenclature (HSN)
codes, various disputes have arisen on the exact placement of these products
for determining the tax rates applicable to them.
There have been litigations over the GST rates on cheese balls, Fryums, flavored
milk, Appy Fizz, rava idli mix, and other items.
Source:::
Business Standard,
dated 13/10/2022.